Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence for Managerial Verification in Multinational Contract Management.
An Integrative Review and Inductive Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70715/jitcai.2026.v3.i3.065Keywords:
Artificial intelligence, Risk management, Managerial decision-making, Regulatory compliance, Governance, Multinational corporationsAbstract
The expansion of organizational activities across national boundaries has intensified challenges related to legal and regulatory compliance, given the variability of tax, labor, environmental, and safety frameworks across jurisdictions. While large multinational corporations typically rely on permanent and specialized compliance structures, small and medium-sized multinational enterprises often operate under resource constraints that limit their ability to sustain comparable systems.
This article examines the application of artificial intelligence (AI), specifically Microsoft Copilot, as a managerial support mechanism for internal verification of regulatory and legal compliance in multinational operations. A qualitative, exploratory, and inductive design was adopted, integrating an integrative literature review with an inductive case study grounded in documented contract management practices within a small European multinational organization.
The findings indicate a gradual shift toward higher-quality outputs as the AI system becomes increasingly contextualized, reflected in improved coherence, verification practices, and traceability of managerial decisions. In the real-world case analyzed, AI-assisted assessments were fully consistent with the conclusions reached by external legal counsel. These results suggest that AI embedded in office productivity platforms can enhance managerial verification processes in small multinational firms when deployed under explicit human supervision and responsible governance frameworks.
Downloads
References
[1] M. Oppioli, MJ Sousa, M. Sousa, and E. de Nuccio, “Artificial intelligence in managerial decision-making: A structured literature review,” Management Decision, 2023, doi: 10.1108/MD-08-2023-1331.
[2] R. Rydzewski, “Artificial intelligence and managerial decision-making: Adoption, opportunities, and accountability,” Managerial Economics, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 77–89, 2025, doi: 10.7494/manage.2025.26.1.77.
[3] R. Boncella, “Ethical alignment of artificial intelligence in management decision making,” Information Systems Education Journal (IACIS IIS), vol. 22, no. 4, 2024, doi: 10.48009/4_iis_2024_116.
[4] GHC Souza, CA Wanderley, and AB de Aguiar, “Transparency and acceptance of artificial intelligence in management decisions,” Journal of Management Control, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s00187-025-00396-7.
[5] Y. Wen, J. Wang, and X. Chen, “Trust and decision weight of artificial intelligence in human resource management,” Frontiers in Psychology – Organizational Psychology, 2025, doi: 10.3389/forgp.2025.1419403.
[6] O. Rivero, “Artificial intelligence and strategic decision-making: A conceptual review,” European Journal of Studies in Management and Business, Vol. 33, no. 3, 2025, doi: 10.32038/mbrq.2025.33.03.
[7] RC Jalagat Jr., “Artificial intelligence in management decision-making: A bibliometric analysis,” International Journal of Economics, Business and Management Research (IJEBMR), Vol. 8, no. 4, 2024, doi: 10.51505/IJEBMR.2024.8404.
[8] M. Numbi and G. Elongha, “Artificial intelligence for managerial optimization in finance and accounting,” Information Systems Education Journal (IACIS IIS), vol. 23, no. 2, 2025, doi: 10.48009/2_iis_2025_138.
Downloads
Published
Data Availability Statement
We have not made the research data availableIssue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Msc. Fernando Ivan Jaimes Rada, Msc. Julia Enith Herrera Mendoza (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.








