When Everyone Has the Same AI: Rethinking Startup Competitive Advantage in the Age of Generative AI
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70715/jitcai.2026.v3.i4.085Keywords:
Generative AI, Competitive advantage, Commoditization, Foundation models, startups, Complementary assetsAbstract
Generative artificial intelligence (AI), delivered through general-purpose foundation models accessible on demand at low cost, has become available to firms of all sizes. This accessibility challenges the dominant view in which AI capability, built from scarce data, infrastructure, and talent, is a source of competitive advantage: when the same frontier capability can be rented by any firm, the model satisfies neither the rarity nor the inimitability conditions that the resource-based view requires of an advantage-conferring resource. This paper develops a conceptual framework explaining where competitive advantage resides once generative AI becomes, in effect, a shared utility. Engaging the precedent of the information-technology commoditization debate, it argues that generative AI differs in kind: it commoditizes capability rather than infrastructure, displacing advantage from the technology to the complements it cannot replicate. The paper names this regularity the advantage-relocation mechanism, the displacement of advantage, when a capability-like technology is commoditized, toward co-specialized complements such as proprietary data, domain judgment, customer relationships, and the orchestration capability that converts a common model into a distinctive value proposition. Stated at the level of the firm, with resource-constrained startups as its sharpest boundary condition, the framework yields falsifiable propositions on the relocation of advantage, the role of absorptive capacity in differentiating firms that use identical models, and the accelerated erosion of AI-derived advantage. It contributes a strategic account of competitive advantage under technological commoditization and an agenda for empirical testing.
Downloads
References
[1] P. Mikalef and M. Gupta, ‘Artificial intelligence capability: Conceptualization, measurement calibration, and empirical study on its impact on organizational creativity and firm performance’, Information & Management, vol. 58, no. 3, p. 103434, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.im.2021.103434. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2021.103434
[2] J. Barney, ‘Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage’, Journal of Management, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 99–120, Mar. 1991, doi: 10.1177/014920639101700108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
[3] B. Wernerfelt, ‘A Resource-Based View of the Firm’, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 5, no. 2, Art. no. 2, 1984. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250050207
[4] A. Gupta, F. Qian, E. Simintzi, and Y. Sun, ‘Generative AI and Entrepreneurship’, 2025, SSRN. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.5971474. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5971474
[5] P. Mikalef et al., ‘Examining how AI capabilities can foster organizational performance in public organizations’, Government Information Quarterly, vol. 40, no. 2, p. 101797, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2022.101797. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101797
[6] A. S. Bharadwaj, ‘A Resource-Based Perspective on Information Technology Capability and Firm Performance: An Empirical Investigation1’, MIS Quarterly, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 169–196, Mar. 2000, doi: 10.2307/3250983. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3250983
[7] E. Brynjolfsson and L. M. Hitt, ‘Beyond Computation: Information Technology, Organizational Transformation and Business Performance’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 23–48, Nov. 2000, doi: 10.1257/jep.14.4.23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.14.4.23
[8] W. M. Cohen and D. A. Levinthal, ‘Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation’, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 35, no. 1, p. 128, Mar. 1990, doi: 10.2307/2393553. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553
[9] D. J. Teece, G. Pisano, and A. Shuen, ‘Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management’, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 509–533, 1997. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z
[10] D. J. Teece, ‘Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance’, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 28, no. 13, pp. 1319–1350, Dec. 2007, doi: 10.1002/smj.640. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640
[11] K. M. Eisenhardt and J. A. Martin, ‘Dynamic capabilities: what are they?’, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 21, no. 10‐11, pp. 1105–1121, 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1105::AID-SMJ133>3.0.CO;2-E
[12] G. Lanfranchi, A. Cioli, A. Amanti, and L. Marinelli, ‘Reconfiguring competitive advantage: a resource dynamic framework for generative AI adoption in digital content marketing’, European Journal of Innovation Management, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 770–798, Apr. 2026, doi: 10.1108/EJIM-03-2024-0317. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-03-2024-0317
[13] C. Zabel and D. O’Brien, ‘Understanding dynamic capabilities in emerging technology markets: antecedents, sequential nature, and impact on innovation performance in the extended reality industry’, EJIM, vol. 27, no. 9, pp. 305–336, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.1108/EJIM-07-2023-0574. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-07-2023-0574
[14] A. Cataldo and R. McQueen, ‘Strategic Driver or Unimportant Commodity? A Decade After “IT Doesn’t Matter,” SMEs Prove That It Really Does’, Industrial Engineer, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 36–41, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5704/MOJ.1507.011
[15] S. Mitropoulos and C. Douligeris, ‘Why and how informatics and applied computing can still create structural changes and competitive advantage’, Applied Computing and Informatics, vol. 21, no. 3–4, pp. 198–208, Oct. 2025, doi: 10.1108/ACI-06-2021-0149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/ACI-06-2021-0149
[16] A. R. Doshi, J. J. Bell, E. Mirzayev, and B. S. Vanneste, ‘Generative artificial intelligence and evaluating strategic decisions’, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 583–610, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.1002/smj.3677. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3677
[17] F. Marty and T. Warin, ‘Data and Computing Power: The New Frontiers of Competition in Generative AI’, Groupe de REcherche en Droit, Economie, Gestion (GREDEG CNRS), Université Côte d’Azur, Nice, France, GREDEG Working Papers 2025–38, Sep. 2025. [Online]. Available: https://ideas.repec.org/p/gre/wpaper/2025-38.html
[18] A. Abbott and S. Marar, ‘Is Data Really a Barrier to Entry? Rethinking Competition Regulation in Generative AI’, Albany Law Journal of Science and Technology, vol. 36, no. 1, 2024, [Online]. Available: https://www.mercatus.org/research/working-papers/is-data-really-barrier-entry-rethinking-competition-regulation-generative-ai
[19] H. Inciarte, ‘Tacit expertise as competitive differentiation: Why generic AI implementations fail in domain-specific business contexts’, Social Science Research Network (SSRN), Working Paper, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://ssrn.com DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6704758
[20] J. Vipra and A. Korinek, ‘Market Concentration Implications of Foundation Models’, Nov. 02, 2023, arXiv: arXiv:2311.01550. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2311.01550.
[21] P. Azoulay, J. Krieger, and A. Nagaraj, ‘Old Moats for New Models: Openness, Control, and Competition in Generative AI’, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA, w32474, May 2024. doi: 10.3386/w32474. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w32474
[22] A. Eisfeldt, G. Schubert, and M. B. Zhang, ‘Generative AI and Firm Values’, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA, w31222, May 2023. doi: 10.3386/w31222. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w31222
[23] D. J. Teece, ‘Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy’, Research Policy, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 285–305, Dec. 1986, doi: 10.1016/0048-7333(86)90027-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(86)90027-2
[24] N. G. Carr, ‘IT Doesn’t Matter’, Harvard Business Review, vol. 81, no. 5, pp. 41–49, 2003, doi: 10.1109/emr.2004.25006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/EMR.2004.25006
[25] R. Raghavan, ‘Moat Half-Life: Modeling Competitive Advantage in Technology Companies’, 2026, SSRN. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.6814958. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6814958
[26] K. F. Nzembayie and D. Urbano, ‘Generative AI platforms as institutional catalysts of digital entrepreneurship: Enablement, dependence & power dynamics’, Technology in Society, vol. 84, p. 103074, Mar. 2026, doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103074. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103074
[27] N. Shidende and A. Mwogosi, ‘Exploring the impact of generative AI tools on healthcare delivery in Tanzania’, Journal of Health Organization and Management, vol. 39, no. 8, pp. 1580–1599, Nov. 2025, doi: 10.1108/JHOM-01-2025-0007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JHOM-01-2025-0007
[28] Y. Liu, J. Huang, and H. Wang, Who on Earth Is Using Generative AI? Global Trends and Shifts in 2025. Washington, DC: World Bank, 2025. doi: 10.1596/1813-9450-11231. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-11231
Downloads
Published
Data Availability Statement
No primary data were generated or analysed in this study. The paper is a conceptual, theory-building contribution based on an integrative review of published literature; all sources are cited in the reference list.
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Mwita Joseph James Wanyancha (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.








