When Does AI Capability Convert to Advantage? A Complementarity-Gated Framework for Startups in Resource-Constrained Economies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70715/jitcai.2026.v3.i4.091Keywords:
Artificial intelligence capability, emerging economies, Competitive Advantage, startup performanceAbstract
Purpose: This paper develops a conceptual framework linking artificial intelligence (AI) capability, competitive advantage, and startup performance in emerging economies, addressing the limited and fragmented understanding of how AI capability translates into venture outcomes in resource-constrained contexts.
Design/methodology/approach: The paper employs a structured review of empirical and theoretical literature, grounded in the resource-based view (RBV) and the dynamic capabilities perspective. It synthesizes evidence across studies to identify points of convergence, divergence, and unresolved tension, and on this basis derives a set of testable propositions.
Findings: The review shows that AI capability is a multidimensional construct whose translation into competitive advantage is conditional rather than automatic: it depends on complementary resources such as digital skills, infrastructure, organizational and absorptive capacity, and strategic alignment that are systematically scarce in emerging-economy startups. The paper advances a framework in which competitive advantage mediates the AI capability–performance relationship, but in which that mediating pathway is itself gated by the availability of complementary resources, making the capability–advantage link contingent on context rather than a general regularity.
Originality: The paper's contribution is not that AI capability requires complements, a point established in prior literature, but that it formalises where complementarity binds: not on the path from advantage to performance, where most mediation literature locates contingency, but on the prior path from capability to advantage itself. It specifies this as three concrete, measurable gating conditions: digital infrastructure, founder AI literacy, and ecosystem support, rather than treating resource scarcity as unmodelled context. This repositions AI capability from a resource assumed to convert into advantage into one whose conversion is itself the object of theoretical and empirical explanation, with the moderated pathway as the paper's central, testable claim.
Downloads
References
[1] P. Mikalef and M. Gupta, ‘Artificial intelligence capability: Conceptualization, measurement calibration, and empirical study on its impact on organizational creativity and firm performance’, Information & Management, vol. 58, no. 3, p. 103434, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.im.2021.103434. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2021.103434
[2] J. Barney, ‘Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage’, Journal of Management, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 99–120, Mar. 1991, doi: 10.1177/014920639101700108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
[3] B. Wernerfelt, ‘A Resource-Based View of the Firm’, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 5, no. 2, Art. no. 2, 1984. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250050207
[4] K. M. Eisenhardt and J. A. Martin, ‘Dynamic Capabilities: What Are They?’, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 21, no. 10/11, pp. 1105–1121, 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1105::AID-SMJ133>3.0.CO;2-E
[5] D. J. Teece, ‘Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance’, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 28, no. 13, pp. 1319–1350, Dec. 2007, doi: 10.1002/smj.640. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640
[6] D. J. Teece, G. Pisano, and A. Shuen, ‘Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management’, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 18, no. 7, Art. no. 7, 1997. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z
[7] D. J. Teece, ‘Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy’, Research Policy, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 285–305, Dec. 1986, doi: 10.1016/0048-7333(86)90027-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(86)90027-2
[8] W. M. Cohen and D. A. Levinthal, ‘Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation’, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 35, no. 1, p. 128, Mar. 1990, doi: 10.2307/2393553. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553
[9] J. B. Barney and W. S. Hesterly, Strategic Management and Competitive Advantage: Concepts. Pearson Prentice Hall, 2008.
[10] N. Cardeal, ‘Valuable, rare, inimitable resources and organization (VRIO) resources or valuable, rare, inimitable resources (VRI) capabilities: What leads to competitive advantage?’, Afr. J. Bus. Manage., vol. 6, no. 37, Sep. 2012, doi: 10.5897/AJBM12.295. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5897/AJBM12.295
[11] D. J. Teece, ‘Hand in Glove: Open Innovation and the Dynamic Capabilities Framework’, Strategic Management Review, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 233–253, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.1561/111.00000010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1561/111.00000010
[12] A. S. Bharadwaj, ‘A Resource-Based Perspective on Information Technology Capability and Firm Performance: An Empirical Investigation1’, MIS Quarterly, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 169–196, Mar. 2000, doi: 10.2307/3250983. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3250983
[13] P. Mikalef, S. O. Fjørtoft, and H. Y. Torvatn, ‘Developing an Artificial Intelligence Capability: A Theoretical Framework for Business Value’, in Business Information Systems Workshops, vol. 373, W. Abramowicz and R. Corchuelo, Eds, in Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol. 373. , Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019, pp. 409–416. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-36691-9_34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36691-9_34
[14] P. Mikalef et al., ‘Examining how AI capabilities can foster organizational performance in public organizations’, Government Information Quarterly, vol. 40, no. 2, p. 101797, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2022.101797. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101797
[15] Y. Gao, S. Liu, and L. Yang, ‘Artificial intelligence and innovation capability: A dynamic capabilities perspective’, International Review of Economics & Finance, vol. 98, p. 103923, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.iref.2025.103923. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2025.103923
[16] S.-L. Wamba-Taguimdje, S. F. Wamba, J. R. K. Kamdjoug, and C. E. T. Wanko, ‘Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Firm Performance: Exploring the Mediating Effect of Process-Oriented Dynamic Capabilities’, in Digital Business Transformation, vol. 38, R. Agrifoglio, R. Lamboglia, D. Mancini, and F. Ricciardi, Eds, in Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation, vol. 38. , Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020, pp. 3–18. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-47355-6_1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47355-6_1
[17] A. A. Alhelal, A. A. Alshiha, and B. S. Al-Romeedy, ‘AI-Driven Sustainable Competitive Advantage in Tourism and Hospitality: Mediating Roles of Digital Culture and Skills’, Sustainability, vol. 17, no. 19, p. 8903, Oct. 2025, doi: 10.3390/su17198903. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su17198903
[18] L. Ardito, R. Filieri, E. Raguseo, and C. Vitari, ‘Artificial intelligence adoption and revenue growth in European SMEs: synergies with IoT and big data analytics’, Internet Research, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 1508–1534, Nov. 2025, doi: 10.1108/INTR-02-2024-0195. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-02-2024-0195
[19] A. Cimino, V. Corvello, C. Troise, A. Thomas, and M. Tani, ‘Artificial Intelligence Adoption for Sustainable Growth in SMES : An Extended Dynamic Capability Framework’, Corp Soc Responsibility Env, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 6120–6138, Sep. 2025, doi: 10.1002/csr.70019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.70019
[20] F. Ul Haq, N. M. Suki, H. Zaigham, A. Masood, and A. Rajput, ‘Exploring AI Adoption and SME Performance in Resource-Constrained Environments: A TOE–RBV Perspective with Mediation and Moderation Effects’, Journal of Digital Economy, p. S2773067025000330, Jul. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.jdec.2025.07.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdec.2025.07.002
[21] C. A. Gunawan and G. Ongkowijoyo, ‘Assessing the Mediating Role of Competitive Advantage: The Influence of Innovation Capabilities and Strategic Flexibility on Firm Performance in East Java’s F&B Industry Post COVID-19’, Dinasti International Journal of Economics, Finance & Accounting, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 516–534, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.38035/dijefa.v6i1.4004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.38035/dijefa.v6i1.4004
[22] M. Novitasari and D. Agustia, ‘Competitive advantage as a mediating effect in the impact of green innovation and firm performance’, Business: Theory and Practice, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 216–226, May 2023, doi: 10.3846/btp.2023.15865. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/btp.2023.15865
[23] Z. Zahara, M. Muslimin, A. Rumijati, and Z. T. Rony, ‘Competitive Advantage as Mediating Role to Enhance MSMES Performance’, Journal of Small Business Strategy, vol. 34, no. 2, Sep. 2024, doi: 10.53703/001c.121131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53703/001c.121131
[24] E. A. Gani, C. Herdinata, and L. Dewi, ‘Digital Transformation on Competitive Advantage through Customer Experience in Indonesian Companies’, JIMKES, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 4321–4334, Nov. 2025, doi: 10.37641/jimkes.v13i6.3978. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37641/jimkes.v13i6.3978
[25] K. Kiyabo and N. Isaga, ‘Strategic entrepreneurship, competitive advantage, and SMEs’ performance in the welding industry in Tanzania’, J Glob Entrepr Res, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 62, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.1186/s40497-019-0188-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40497-019-0188-9
[26] N. Venkatraman and V. Ramanujam, ‘Measurement of Business Performance in Strategy Research: A Comparison of Approaches’, The Academy of Management Review, vol. 11, no. 4, p. 801, Oct. 1986, doi: 10.2307/258398. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/258398
[27] J. Dawes, ‘The Relationship between Subjective and Objective Company Performance Measures in Market Orientation Research: Further Empirical Evidence’, 1999, [Online]. Available: http://marketing-bulletin.massey.ac.nz/v10/mb_v10_n3_dawes.pdf
[28] D. Welbotha and C. van den Berg, ‘Big Data Analytics Capabilities and the Organisational Performance of South African Retailers’, South African Computer Journal, vol. 36, no. 2, 2024, doi: 10.18489/sacj.v36i2.17937. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18489/sacj.v36i2/17937
[29] F. M. Omambia, ‘Artificial Intelligence (AI) And Financial Performance of the Financial Service Industry in Kenya’, AJOCS, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 86–94, Jul. 2025, doi: 10.59413/ajocs/v6.i4.8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59413/ajocs/v6.i4.8
[30] National Council for Artificial Intelligence, ‘Egypt National Artificial Intelligence Strategy: Second Edition (2025–2030)’, Ministry of Communications and Information Technology (MCIT), Cairo, Egypt, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://ai.gov.eg/SynchedFiles/en/Resources/AIstrategy%20English%2016-1-2025-1.pdf
[31] D. Hanyurwimfura, ‘Rwanda: Advancing Science Through the Development of Artificial Intelligence’, in Preparing National Research Ecosystems for AI: Third Edition, D. Castle, V. McBride, and J. Randles, Eds, International Science Council, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://council.science/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/Rwanda-AI.pdf
[32] Tanzania Startup Association, ‘Tanzania Startup Ecosystem Status Report 2025’, Tanzania Startup Association, Dar es Salaam, Annual Ecosystem Report, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.tsa.co.tz
[33] D. Utonga, C. S. Tundui, and E. Mkuna, ‘Harnessing performance through digital technology adoption: an empirical analysis of SMEs in the Tanzanian fruit juice processing industry’, Cogent Business & Management, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 2612771, Dec. 2026, doi: 10.1080/23311975.2026.2612771. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2026.2612771
[34] Md. A. I. Gazi et al., ‘AI Capability and Sustainable Performance: Unveiling the Mediating Effects of Organizational Creativity and Green Innovation with Knowledge Sharing Culture as a Moderator’, Sustainability, vol. 16, no. 17, p. 7466, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.3390/su16177466. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177466
[35] J. F. Hair, J. J. Risher, M. Sarstedt, and C. M. Ringle, ‘When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM’, EBR, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 2–24, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
[36] P. M. Podsakoff, S. B. MacKenzie, J.-Y. Lee, and N. P. Podsakoff, ‘Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.’, Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 88, no. 5, pp. 879–903, 2003, doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
[37] E. Roemer, F. Schuberth, and J. Henseler, ‘HTMT2–an improved criterion for assessing discriminant validity in structural equation modeling’, IMDS, vol. 121, no. 12, pp. 2637–2650, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.1108/IMDS-02-2021-0082. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-02-2021-0082
[38] X. Zhao, J. G. Lynch, and Q. Chen, ‘Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and Truths about Mediation Analysis’, J Consum Res, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 197–206, Aug. 2010, doi: 10.1086/651257. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/651257
[39] J. Henseler, C. M. Ringle, and M. Sarstedt, ‘A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling’, J. of the Acad. Mark. Sci., vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 115–135, Jan. 2015, doi: 10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
[40] K. Abrokwah-Larbi and Y. Awuku-Larbi, ‘The impact of artificial intelligence in marketing on the performance of business organizations: evidence from SMEs in an emerging economy’, JEEE, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 1090–1117, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.1108/JEEE-07-2022-0207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JEEE-07-2022-0207
Downloads
Published
Data Availability Statement
No primary data were generated or analysed in this study. The paper is a conceptual, theory-building contribution developed through a structured review of published literature; all sources are cited in the reference list.
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Mwita Wanyancha, Moureen Lembris Mollel (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.








